THE LION KING (2019) MOVIE REVIEW
Considering the success of the original Lion King it's easy to see why Disney would remake arguably their greatest success 25 years after the fact. However we can't celebrate with a simple 3 minute montage because that won't make a profit. Instead it's time to take advantage of people's nostalgia and remake The Lion King. And to really hammer home it's a 'new movie', let's take away the original's greatest strength, the cartoonish animation and replace it with realistic appearances and mannerisms that don't fit for not only a king but the rest of the cast.
I've debated for a while whether to review this film as it stands or compare it to it's superior predecessor but when it comes down to it, it's near impossible to judge this film without bringing up how the original portrayed certain moments monumentally better. If you don't know the story of Lion King, or Hamlet for that matter, we explore Simba's journey in becoming King after his father was murdered by his uncle Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and having many years away learning who he is and needs to become. Thankfully the overall story was not affected in the slightest which would be ludicrous if Disney changed anything in that regard. However here lies my biggest problem with the film. There are many memorable scenes in The Lion King ranging from the reveal of Pride Rock, Mufasa's death and even the 'Can You Feel The Love Tonight?' sequence. As it stands these scenes were some of the best in the original but when realistic settings are plastered on, the impact of these moments plummet drastically as the characters have zero emotion in their eyes and in their movements. This ultimately led to these iconic moments feeling empty, awkward and bland, something I never thought I'd be saying about The Lion King.
Credit where credits due though because the animation in the movie does look phenomenal. The animals themselves do look incredibly realistic and is easy to get lost and forget you're watching The Lion King as appose to a David Attenborough documentary. Not sure if that's what they were trying to achieve but hey..it kind of, not really worked in it's favour. On top of the appearance, the vocal performances given were passable. Although no one did an inherently terrible job there was only one or two performances that were semi-memorable. These being Chiwetel Ejiofor as Scar and James Earl Jones as Mufasa and with Jones its easy to see why he was perfect for this role as he was easily the best part of the original vocally speaking. Ejiofor on the other hand proved to be a worthy successor to Jeremy Irons whom played Scar previously and defiently had inspiration from Irons' performance by articulating every syllable in a menacing and commanding manner and never felt like the actor was just doing their voice. Which leads me to Seth Rogen who in my opinion did the worst job as he never put a twist on the character but instead opted to get himself over by doing his laugh every chance he gets. Again this sounds like a petty aspect to complain about but when you hear his laugh over and over again, you'll understand the pain I feel whenever I watch him.
If there's one word I could use to describe The Lion King it would be disappointing. Despite boasting passable performances and impressive visuals, these quickly turned into the film's downfall as by going all in with the appearances rather than catering to a new and older audience on an emotional spectrum, it leaves little to no impact as appose to the timeless impact left by the 1994 version. And while Hakuna Matata does mean no worries, I have a feeling Disney will have plenty to worry about after the criticism this movie is receiving.
OVERALL
5 / 10






